Networker

[Networker] Drive speed?

2011-12-09 10:52:34
Subject: [Networker] Drive speed?
From: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:51:36 -0500
A basic question here on drive speed, but maybe not a simple answer as there are undoubtedly numerous variables involved.

Let's say you have an LTO-4 drive (SAS connection to the tape library) with a single stream (one save set) clocking in around 4-10 MB/sec, coming in over the network. You then start another backup (also a single stream) from the same client to the same drive, and now it jumps up to 70+ MB/sec, and remains at that speed until that second save set completes, and then quiets down to 4-10 MB/sec again. I've seen this happen with a number of other streams, too, wherein running just one of them from that same client, concurrent with the already running stream, cranks the speed up considerably, until it's done, at which point the original stream is reported again to be running at the same slow pace.

We all know that a drive will come closer to performing optimally when you can keep it streaming, and you can do that by keeping its buffer full. OK, so having more concurrent streams - up to a point - will improve drive performance, BUT does it affect the speed at which the slow stream runs?

In other words, when the reported write speed jumps up to 70+ MB/sec because you're now sending another stream (possibly one that compresses well), is the original stream (possibly one that does not compress so well) now increasing its write speed as a result? Or is it instead the case that while the drive is now functioning more optimally, and writing more data per second, that first (slow) stream is still clunking along at its original speed, and sending more streams will not increase the speed of any one of them?

I'm inclined to think that the increase in speed is only affecting the additional stream(s) and not that original one.

Thanks.

George

--
George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>