Networker

Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS

2011-07-22 12:45:33
Subject: Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS
From: "Morton, Jeffrey" <Jeffrey.Morton AT MULTIPLAN DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:44:39 -0400
Yes, that was a typo on my part.  I was referring to the saveset
ALLVMFS.

Besides the NTFS-5 file system requirement, it sounds like saveset
FULLVM is superior to saveset ALLVMFS as it provides the same file level
recovery capability with the added image level recovery capability.

I'm not seeing the downside, unless there is come performance hit or
there will be potential issues with recovery in the future.

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Chester Martin
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:36 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS

Also if "fullvmfs" is the vadp equivalent to vcb's "allvmfs" it may not
grab system state data.

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Eugene Vilensky
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 11:02 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Morton, Jeffrey <
Jeffrey.Morton AT multiplan DOT com> wrote:

> To those that are using the NetWorker VMware VADP integration, is 
> there any particular reason you would use FULLVMFS over an image 
> considering you can recover files from the image as well?


FULLVMFS isn't supported on non-NTFS file systems is one good reason.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________


NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This message and any attachments contains 
confidential information belonging to the sender intended only for the use of 
the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be 
advised that copying, disclosure or reliance upon the contents is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender 
immediately.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>