Networker

Re: [Networker] Supported NDMP devices

2011-07-11 15:10:15
Subject: Re: [Networker] Supported NDMP devices
From: "Clark, Patti" <clarkp AT OSTI DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:08:22 -0400
Since Oracle recently acquired Pillar Data Systems, I'll leave it up to them to 
campaign for the support.  Thank you for replying.

Patti Clark
IIa

 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: EMC NetWorker discussion 
>[mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On Behalf Of bingo
>Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 1:16 PM
>To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
>Subject: [Networker] Supported NDMP devices
>
>You are absolutely right - a standardized HW just work without 
>any hard-/software that supports this standard. "Supported" 
>means that it has been 'tested and approved'. It does not mean 
>that other solutions will not work.
>
>BTW - i have heard that you can ask EMC to get your 
>environment supported - no idea about terms, condition and price.
>
>If supported, there are other alternatives like snapshots 
>backups. However, this depends on your environment. Please see 
>the NetWorker portfolio or ask EMC for details.
>
>+----------------------------------------------------------------------
>|This was sent by carsten_reinfeld AT avus-cr DOT de via Backup Central.
>|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
>+----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>I understand there is a hardware compatibility list, but I still need to ask 
>>the question.   I have a Pillar Data Storage NAS that has NDMP capability.  
>>One would think >>that this is a well-defined protocol that is not dependent 
>>on hardware compatibility.  In our recent maintenance purchasing exercise, 
>>I'd inquired about adding the 
>>NDMP license to our pool only to be informed that our NAS is not supported.  
>>So, the question, why does the hardware need to be "supported"  when the 
>>dialog 
>>should be via a well-defined protocol?
>>
>>Secondarily, other than backing up the mounted filesystems from a networker 
>>client, is there any other recommended  backup methodology that is more 
>>efficient?
>>
>>Patti Clark - GSEC
>>IIa
>>Sr. Linux/UNIX System Administrator
>>Office of Scientific and Technical Information

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>