Networker

[Networker] VTLs and backups

2011-06-07 17:22:54
Subject: [Networker] VTLs and backups
From: mitch808 <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:21:06 -0700
VTL's are a dieing technology.  People much prefer to backup to disk, going 
further with backing up to a disk target that does deduplication.

Your 9TB's of Exch is nothing with modern dedupe appliances.

VTL's are complex when they don't need to be.  They emulate tape,and suffer the 
same physical limitations that tape has, even though it's "virtual."
It's much easier to move data over an NFS mount or CIFS share, and let your 
backup app clone or duplicate to tape from there.

My personal preference is just get the correct sized DataDomain box, and call 
it a day.  Go one step further and throw in BOOST, and a 2nd box and you can 
replicate your data through NW as a simple clone job.  Now you can minimize or 
completely eliminate your tape requirements if you replicate to a different 
location.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by mnabors AT gmail DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>