Yup. All savesets are in the same pool. I still don't see why a single
tape drive out of two tape drives with a target sessions value much higher
than what is required cannot receive four concurrent savesets instead of
having them spread across both tape drives.

On 6/3/11 7:47 AM, "bingo" <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM> wrote:

>Let me suggest to walk away from the parallelism for a moment. As i
>mentioned already, NW should not behave that way.
>
>The question is whether all save sets go to media of the same pool. If
>not, then it is obvious tha NW must use both drives.
>
>+----------------------------------------------------------------------
>|This was sent by carsten_reinfeld AT avus-cr DOT de via Backup Central.
>|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
>+----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
>type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
>networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
>list. You can access the archives at
>http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
>via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER