Networker

[Networker] Not in media index

2010-07-01 10:51:30
Subject: [Networker] Not in media index
From: wallace88 <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:49:26 -0400
> wallace88 > command scanner -m and -i is taking the same time Sad


scanner -i update the client file index and the media database.   

Scanner -m only updates the media database.


So there is a difference.  However, since it seems that both takes the same 
amount of time, then the prominent factor is the amount of multiplexing that 
was done at the time of backup.

This is a good reminder that, in general, higher parallelisms favor faster 
backups, but slower recoveries.  You need to benchmark your recoveries to 
ensure that the recover times meet your business needs.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by wl905 AT yahoo DOT ca via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>