Networker

[Networker] Index question

2010-03-21 21:57:29
Subject: [Networker] Index question
From: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:55:56 -0400
Usually when I run a backup estimate as:

savegrp -n -l incr groupname

It usually always reports some greater than zero value for the client's index, never mind the save sets. What seems odd to me is why would it report a non-zero value for the index itself if nothing in the index has changed since the last level 9?

Granted, data has changed under the affected save set, but the only way the index would change would be if a backup ran, and then the index gets updated. We have multiple NSR client resources for the same client, each being in a different group. Every group also saves the index. After running incrementals for all the groups 1, 2, 3, ... and then adding some new data to the save set for group 1 and then running only an incremental estimate on group 1, it reports what I would expect for the save set but it also reports a non-zero value for the index. How could it report that the index is still non-zero?

The only thing I can see is that it's taking the expected size of the incremental for the save set itself and factoring in how much of an index change this would result in and reporting that, maybe ???

George

--
George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>