[Networker] Index question
2010-03-21 21:57:29
Usually when I run a backup estimate as:
savegrp -n -l incr groupname
It usually always reports some greater than zero value for the client's
index, never mind the save sets. What seems odd to me is why would it
report a non-zero value for the index itself if nothing in the index has
changed since the last level 9?
Granted, data has changed under the affected save set, but the only way
the index would change would be if a backup ran, and then the index gets
updated. We have multiple NSR client resources for the same client, each
being in a different group. Every group also saves the index. After
running incrementals for all the groups 1, 2, 3, ... and then adding
some new data to the save set for group 1 and then running only an
incremental estimate on group 1, it reports what I would expect for the
save set but it also reports a non-zero value for the index. How could
it report that the index is still non-zero?
The only thing I can see is that it's taking the expected size of the
incremental for the save set itself and factoring in how much of an
index change this would result in and reporting that, maybe ???
George
--
George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or
unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Index question,
George Sinclair <=
|
|
|