On 10 March 2010 18:51, Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT uvm DOT edu> wrote:

> On 3/10/10 11:16 AM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
> > So what's the latest word on upgrades from 7.2?  Is 7.6 a viable
> > option or is 7.4/7.5 more "fully cooked"?  We're not really looking
> > for features so much as support for the latest client platforms and
> > stability.
>
> At this very moment 7.5sp2 has the most current OS support (It's the first
> one out the door
> that supports Windows 2008 R2).  7.6sp1 should be along in a little bit,
> and it too will
> support Windows 2008 R2.  I suspect that 7.4sp5 is close enough to EOSL
> that it won't be
> updated (or if I read between the lines of what I'm told by support -- it
> can't be updated) to

support 2008 R2.
>
>
At the mo I would agree with the above.. Anything between 7.3 and 7.5.0 is
worth skipping, with 7.5.1 some good (stable) features were added. 7.5.2
should bring in more stability - having used 7.5.1 for a while now I can say
it is fairly stable, so SP2 should be even bette. 7.6 is still early in life
so better waiting for  7.6 SP2 and later in my opinion.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER