Networker

[Networker] Level 9 backup of indexes?

2010-02-26 17:21:27
Subject: [Networker] Level 9 backup of indexes?
From: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:19:00 -0500
Why does NW still back up an index if there's no data to back up?

(NW 7.5SP1, running on Linux)
I ran an incremental group with two Windows clients: one save set each. Nothing had changed on client1 since the last backup (level=full), so I get the usual "4 B" for its save set size, but it still backed up the client's index as a level 9. However, it's the same size at the previous backup for the index which was a level full.

I understand that NW always backs up indexes at a level 9 when doing incrementals (guess that's safer than if it backed them up at the same level as the save sets), but I'm not clear on why a level 9 would capture the same amount that the level full did? I thought a level 9 captured everything that's changed since the last lower numbered backup, which in this case would be a full (level 0). Nothing's changed since then, though, so I would have expected no backup of the index?

--
George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Networker] Level 9 backup of indexes?, George Sinclair <=