EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on
11/04/2009 10:22:24 AM:
> If tapes are EXPIRED but not relabelled yet, you do not
> need to scan tapes to recover from. Use recover -S SSID.
This will give you the whole saveset, mind you. If all you want is just
certain files/directories out of that saveset, you would have to tell it
to give you just those.
> Rebuiling/restoring CFI is only needed if you want to browse
> old backup's file namespace.
If you don't know exactly what files/directories you need out of the SSID
above, then you'd have to runn scanner, so that you could browse, and pick
and choose.
> If you know the path you want to recover, you can use
> recover -S SSID [-d relocated path] <path to recover>
> It will start reading the tape and just recovering the
> <path to recover> directory.
>
> HTH
>
> Th
> Kind regards - Bien cordialement - Vriendelijke groeten,
>
> Thierry FAIDHERBE
> Backup/Storage & System Management
>
> LE FOREM - Administration Centrale
> Département des Systèmes d'Information
>
> Boulevard Tirou, 104 Tel: + 32 (0)71/206730
> B-6000 CHARLEROI Fax: + 32 (0)71/206199
> BELGIUM Mail : Thierry.faidherbe<at>forem.be
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
> On
> Behalf Of Len Philpot
> Sent: mercredi 4 novembre 2009 15:53
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [Networker] Speed up scanning on numerous tapes (additional
> detail)
>
> > Len Philpot
> >
> > Theoretical / procedural question -
> >
> > Has anyone ever had to scan in, i.e., using "scanner", MANY (i.e.,
> > possibly hundreds) of old expired tapes? If so, is there any way to
> speed
> > up that process?
>
> I hate to reply to my own question, but I just thought of this and maybe
> this matters...
>
> The theoretical tapes are still in the media indexes, but have long
> expired all the savesets browse policies. I've never done a saveset
> recovery, but I assume I still could at this point. I don't think that's
> an option for other reasons, but it could technically be done, right?
>
> Thanks.
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type
> "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with
> this
> list. You can access the archives at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu
> and type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write
> to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems
> with this list. You can access the archives at http://listserv.
> temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|