[Networker] SnapImage vs. PowerSnap
2009-09-22 11:28:28
All,
Over the past year, our file servers data has increased in size, Currently it
is up to 26+ million files. Size is 1TB.
Weekly full backup takes 48 hours to complete. [Rolling Eyes]
We have allocated adv_file type devices ( 4Gbps SATA disk LUNs from CLARiiON
CX3-80) to all three file servers (windows 2K3 64 bit in MSCS) . So data flow
is occurring beween LUNs over fibre and I think the throughput is really low.
I would like to know the difference between PowerSnap & SnapImage modules and
which one will fit best (config/licensing/price) in our infrastructure.
Environment Details:
---Networker Server (Win 2K3 , 32 bit)
---Networker Storage Nodes (Three Win 2k3 , 64 bit in MSCS)
Note: Files servers are configured as NW storage nodes
---Networker Clients (All Windows)
---SAN CLARIION CX3-80
---Dell Tape Library PowerVault ML6020
EMC is recommending SnapImage.
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by soni.parth AT gmail DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] SnapImage vs. PowerSnap,
psoni <=
|
|
|