> From: "David Browning, Jr." <DBrown AT lsuhsc DOT edu>
> Reply-To: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>, 
> "David
> Browning, Jr." <DBrown AT lsuhsc DOT edu>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:58:27 -0500
> To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
> Subject: Re: [Networker] nwadmin with Networker 7.4
> 
> Definitely one of my pet peeves, and I think I even pissed off one of
> the EMC/Legato engineers when I had the chance to talk to him about it.
> 
> They still believe that the 7.4 version is more superior, but quite a
> few people still enjoy the 7.2 version.
> 
> We simply keep a copy of it on one of our old servers, and use it from
> there.  We still have to use 7.4.4 for some things, you can't get around
> that.  But for plain old monitoring, 7.2 is the one we use.

Maybe I am missing something, but if you just monitor with nwadmin, why not
use nsrwatch instead.

Maybe I am in the minority, but I like the NetWorker console, especially for
media management. I still use nsrwatch though for monitoring most of the
time.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER