Networker

Re: [Networker] Use of symbolic names for backups?

2008-10-09 13:42:02
Subject: Re: [Networker] Use of symbolic names for backups?
From: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:41:55 -0400
> From: A Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
> Reply-To: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>, A 
> Darren
> Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:39:09 +0000
> To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
> Subject: Re: [Networker] Use of symbolic names for backups?
> 
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 12:44:57PM -0400, George Sinclair wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have a question here on the use of the '-N' option with the save
>> command. What is the real value of using this? Does anyone have any
>> advice, admonishments or bad experiences they care to share?
> 
> I think you understand all the technical aspects.  It's just a settable
> field.  I assume most will have no use for it, but it is available for
> some of those odd cases at the price of having to drive over to
> Hackville.
> 
> It's the only user-settable field that you can query in mminfo.  So it
> is possible to stick data in there and be able to find it relatively
> quickly.  I can't think of any other way to do that.

I imagine it might come in handy for those who need to write specialized
scripts that depend on mminfo for output.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>