Networker

Re: [Networker] Recomennded concurrent groups.

2008-07-09 17:53:02
Subject: Re: [Networker] Recomennded concurrent groups.
From: Scott Harney <scott.harney AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:40:01 -0500
I don't start any groups simultaneously, but several more than 3 run
concurrently with no issues.  Our backup server doesn't back up anything
directly so the I/O is delegated to remote storage nodes.  But it is still
significantly sized essentially like we might size a database server.

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Browning, David <DBrown AT lsuhsc DOT edu> 
wrote:

> On FULL backup weekends, we easily have more than 3 groups, and can have
> as many as 7 or 8 groups running at the same time.   Not the best
> practice, as you can see a significant issue in regards to system
> resources on the backup server.  I find that older machines have more of
> an issue than newer hardware.
>
>
> David M. Browning Jr.
> IT Project Coordinator Enterprise Backups and Help Desk
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] 
> On
> Behalf Of Yaron Zabary
> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 11:57 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: [Networker] Recomennded concurrent groups.
>
> Hello all,
>
>   Recently, I discussed my nsrjobd issues with my support engineer and
> after he inspected daemon.log, he said that running more than three
> groups at the same time is against EMC's best practice and that if he
> will try to open a case with EMC, I will need to run less than three
> groups at the same time before they will start looking into the problem.
>
> Luckily, he found esg93651 so there is no need to "fix" the parallel
> groups problem. I can have as much as ten groups at a time and  I
> wonder, how many groups other people are running concurrently ?
>
>   Also, can someone point me at this best practice guide which suggests
>
> to limit the number of groups?
>
> --
>
> -- Yaron.
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
> type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with 
> this
> list. You can access the archives at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
> type
> "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with 
> this
> list. You can access the archives at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>