Networker

Re: [Networker] [Message not Scanned] Re: [Networker] Switching from Netbackup to Networker

2008-02-29 20:19:56
Subject: Re: [Networker] [Message not Scanned] Re: [Networker] Switching from Netbackup to Networker
From: "McBeen, Ben" <ben.mcbeen AT PLUMASBANK DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:17:00 -0800
Of course they won't be able to solve your problem... but they call quick! :-)

our record here:

Backupexec 11:
11 issues over 13 months. 0 resolved by support. 6 resolved by ground up rebuilds of system. Yes... thats 6 full rebuilds in just over a year. Things were great before the veritas buyout... but symantec completely destroyed the product line. We used to be a full symantec shop here for everything, but had no choice but to migrate to other solutions. The root of our issues were related to excessive amounts of backups data :-\ . Our system simply crushed the cataloging infrastructure. The for salt in the wound, BE would crash every time we tried to index a tape. If that doesn't give you chills... not sure what would.

Networker:
3 issues over 18 months. 3 solved by support. No rebuilds. Still on original catalogs and config. We have had one serious data corruption issue on our disk-2-disk system that led to loss of backup sets. The errors were caused by hardware failure during backups that networker could not recover from.

Obviously everyone milage will vary.

---------------------------------------------------------
Ben McBeen
Information Technology Systems Engineer
Plumas Bank
530-283-7305 x7602



On Feb 29, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Vernon Harris wrote:

If you think that netbackup support is bad, emc is
worse.  With veritas/symantec, i can normally get a
call back within a couple hrs, with EMC, maybe a
couple of days.

We have two environments, one is netbackup, one legato
and we are looking to go the other way, decomming
networker and going strictly with netbackup.


--- cooke <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM> wrote:

My company is currently using Netbackup (6.0 MP5)
and a STK L180 to backup the Solaris environment,
and BackupExec (11) and a spectralogix T120 to back
up the windows environment.  We are evaluating
switching to an EMC DL210 (fully populated) with
Networker for both Solaris and Windows and
partitioning the spectralogix T120.

I would be interested in input on Networker,
especially if you have used Netbackup / Backup exec
in the past.  How does it compare?  What is the
quality of support?  When major releases go out how
buggy are they (not at all happy with Symantec's
support of Netbackup/BackupExec, but not sure if
Networker is experiencing similar pain after EMC
acquisition).   Any comments appreciated - either
hardware or on the DL210 if you have experience with
the hardware.   Thanks.


+ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by jeanine.cooke AT evenflo DOT com via
Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.

+ ----------------------------------------------------------------------

To sign off this list, send email to
listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff
networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have
any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html
or
via RSS at

http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER




____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER


----------------------------
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted
with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment,
may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure
or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply
email and delete all
copies.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>