Yes, you would.  If the saveset is encrypted during backup, it stays
encrypted when it is cloned.
 
I was trying to speak to the case where the saveset was NOT encrypted
during backup.
 
Sorry for the confusion.
 
tl

________________________________

From: Michael.Leone AT pha.phila DOT gov [mailto:Michael.Leone AT pha.phila DOT 
gov] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:57 AM
To: EMC NetWorker discussion; Lemons, Terry
Cc: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Encrpyption



EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on
01/10/2008 04:35:00 PM:

> Hi Bruce
> 
> I'll start the reply, and others will correct and amplify.
> 
> There are at least three tape drives that offer encryption today:
> 
> - IBM LTO4
> - IBM TS1120 (aka 03592 E05)
> - STK T10000A
> 
> All of these require a supporting environment to provide key 
> management, drive configuration, etc.  For the TS1120 and T10000A at
> least, this adds tens of thousands of dollars to the cost of the 
> drive itself, in my experience.
> 
> NetWorker supports encryption at the client only, during backup.  So
> NetWorker doesn't provide the ability to encrypt during the clone
operation.

I'm confused ... if I have a storage node with an AFTD drvice (disk),
and I have a clone job set ... wouldn't NetWorker encrypt the data to
the drive of the storage node. And if it then clones that drive onto
tape, don't I have an encrypted saveset on tape (because the saveset on
disk was encrypted)? 



To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER