Re: [Networker] Some comments on NetWorker 7.4
2007-08-24 20:31:51
Th drive report is a direct translation of the drive report from NetWorker
Operations. This final step would've allowed them to finally discontinue
NetWorker Operations.
NW ops only reported backup throughput, and thus, so does NMC.
No Staging, cloning, restores :-(
Siobhan
On 25/8/07 1:09 AM, "Stan Horwitz" <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Krishnan, Ramamurthy wrote:
>
>> Stan,
>>
>> Are you planning to do any benchmarking with backup/recover speeds
>> with
>> and without AES directives? If so, please can you share the
>> details? I
>> am just curious to know what is the impact if any, of the
>> encryption on
>> speeds.
>
> Yes. I am hoping that the NetWorker 7.4 reporting mechansm will help
> in that regard.
>
> One thing I see right away is that the NMC doesn't report read
> throughput on tape devices. I was hoping to get the same sort of
> throughput info that's available on devices when they are backing up
> data.
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
> type
> "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with
> this list.
> You can access the archives at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>
Siobhán
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|