Networker

Re: [Networker] New to clones - performance?

2007-07-25 16:31:48
Subject: Re: [Networker] New to clones - performance?
From: "Werth, Dave" <dave.werth AT GARMIN DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:29:04 -0700
Curtis,

You're right, our automatic clones make a copy of the just completed
backup and preserve the multiplexing of the backup.  I've set up the
different backups so they won't generally overlap with each other so
there's no multiplexing of different backups.  When I'm doing a manual
clone of a specific saveset out of a heavily multiplexed backup it can
run rather slowly though.


David Werth
Garmin AT, Inc
Salem, Oregon
dave.werth<at>garmin.com

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Curtis Preston
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:56 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] New to clones - performance?

I'm guessing you're multiplexing your Exchange backups with other
backups.  Automatic cloning is cloning only the Exchange backup, where
as volume cloning is cloning everything on that volume.  So when you're
cloning just Exchange, you're reading all the data on the tape, but
throwing into the bit bucket anything that isn't Exchange.

The other respondent who says his speed is the same probably isn't
multiplexing Exchange backups with other backups.

---
W. Curtis Preston
Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com
VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies 

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Browning, David
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:50 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] New to clones - performance?

I've been dealing with Networker for more than 9 years now, but have
never had to deal with clone issues.   With the recent addition of
storage nodes and dedicated storage nodes, we now have the time to run
clones - something we never had the time to do before. 

If I manually clone an Exchange volume via the GUI, it runs in about 2
hours (give or take a few).   If I set the Exchange Group to
automatically clone, once the backups finish, it runs extremely slow -
in fact the past 2 days, after about 8 hours of cloning, it had finished
only 1 tape, and was working on tape 2.   

If I manually clone, I could get all 5 Exchange tapes cloned much
quicker than having it done automatically - do I have something
configure wrong, or is this just the way Networker works? 

FYI - LTO-3 tapes, about 2.5 - 2.6 TB of Exchange data. 

David M. Browning Jr.
LSUHSC Enterprise Network Operations/Help Desk

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

------------------------- 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole 
use of the intended recipient.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or 
any attachment is prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please contact the sender and delete all copies. 
Thank you for your cooperation 

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>