Just to follow up on the reason to not go directly to Exchange 2007, our
Window's guru told me that there is no conversion program to go directly
from 5.5 to 2007, you have to use 2003 as an intermediate step. So we
will do the conversion to 2003 and let things settle down for 2 or 3
months then upgrade to 2007 later this year.
Dave
David Werth
Garmin AT, Inc
Salem, Oregon
dave.werth<at>garmin.com
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 11:38 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Exchange module version
Also, Dave, I am wondering what prompted your organization's decision
to go from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. I am no Exchange expert,
but my understanding is that Exchange 2007 offers more features than
Exchange 2003, so I am curious why since you are going to upgrade
anyway, why not go with Exchange 2007, or isn't it hardened enough
yet for your organization?
-------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please
be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or
any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Thank you for your cooperation
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|