|
Re: [Networker] Backup Pools
2006-09-21 14:17:07
On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:50 PM — 9/21/06, Ben Harner wrote:
Thanks for the reply. So if I have a jukebox with 7 slots and say
I have 4 different pools with 1 to 2 tapes for each pool you
think there would be long waits between backups? Shouldn't it be
only the wait of the jukebox changing the tape? Right now all
session have to wait for the previous one to finish per tape drive
so wouldn't that be the same either way? Right now I have 15
clients being backed up nightly to one tape drive using one pool.
I am trying to get it so I can specify certain tapes for certain
clients. I'm guessing the only way to do that is through pools.
Is there other ways?
Possibly. Its difficult to say without knowing how much data would go
to the individual devices and how fast the throughput is. Answering
your question would be easier if you explained what your hardware and
network environment is like and the amounts of data involved.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|
