Networker

Re: [Networker] Using ZFS for a disk device?

2006-08-31 20:51:04
Subject: Re: [Networker] Using ZFS for a disk device?
From: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:47:52 +1000
I've being using zfs for the adv_file on my test box for a few months
now. I was using one of the nevada releases earlier, and now 06/06 - it
certainly works on sparc, I expect it would be the same with an x64,
there are a few weird messages when it fails to backup the filesystem
(eg it fails to read .nsr, but then gets nowhere anyway and exits that
saveset) so on observation at least it appears to work just fine. The
usual problem though is getting EMC to sign off that your config is
supported. While it may not be strictly necessary, I believe you can ask
for the hotfix for zfs backups and with that I believe EMC will be ok,
but better to wait for the x4500 to pop up on their HCL nontheless.

I'm planning on getting an X4500 too,  they're not shipping until mid
september anyway, and 7.3.2 / 7.2.3 are rumoured to be released around
then.

-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT listserv.temple DOT edu]
On Behalf Of T S Kimball
Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2006 7:21 PM
To: NETWORKER AT listserv.temple DOT edu
Subject: [Networker] Using ZFS for a disk device?

I've been looking at Sun's new x4500 server, and (though unable to
aquire one anytime soon) made me think about ZFS and the adv_file
device.

I know NW cannot currently backup a ZFS partition; However, since it
also does not backup the contents of an adv_file device either, does
that allow us to use a large (multi-terabyte) ZFS device as part of the
Disk Backup Option?

I'm thinking this would hinge on the ability of a pre-6/06 Solaris app
to be able to do ordinary read/write to that partition, without worrying
about the new ACL subsystem.  Also depends on what Solaris libraries
Networker is linking to I suppose (given recent discussion), though for
now let's assume a 7.2.x server install.

I'm definately curious if someone has tried this.  It would be nice to
know fron a DR standpoint, so that I'd not have to worry about getting
another Veritas license bootstrapped during reconstruction.

Thanks in Advance,
--Tim Kimball

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems wit this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER


NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may contain copyright 
material of Macquarie Bank or third parties. If you are not the intended 
recipient of this email you should not read, print, re-transmit, store or act 
in reliance on this e-mail or any attachments, and should destroy all copies of 
them. Macquarie Bank does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or any 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie Bank.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>