Networker

Re: [Networker] Cloning question

2006-04-06 12:53:10
Subject: Re: [Networker] Cloning question
From: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:51:43 -0700
> 
> Cloning always results in un-multiplexed tapes,

That's not true.  If multiple savesets are specified to nsrclone, and
they are multiplexed on the source, they are also multiplexed on the
target.  

You can use cloning to de-multiplex, but it can take longer and you have
to specify each saveset as a separate nsrclone invocation.

> I cant see any downside to cloning from a clone either...

Nor do I.  Especially in the OP's situation, it seems completely
reasonable.  It also serves as verification of the first clone.  With 3
separate copies that's probably less important, but still nice.

-- 
Darren Dunham                                           ddunham AT taos DOT com
Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>