Networker

[Networker] LTO-2 or LTO-3?

2005-12-19 11:10:03
Subject: [Networker] LTO-2 or LTO-3?
From: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:05:23 -0500
Hi,

We're thinking to upgrade to LTO-2 or LTO-3 drives. We're currently using LTO-1 drives (Seagate) on an STK L80. Does anyone have any advice on this issue? We're mostly looking for higher capacity. We'd be running Legato 7.x on a Dell poweredge 6650 storage node, running RedHat Linux, to manage the library with Solaris running on the primary server. We'd be using LSI HBA LVD/SE cards (dual channel cards with 320 MBps per channel), which I would think would be more than fast enough.

Any bad experiences you'd care to share? Any particular vendor like IBM versus HP you prefer? Howe about the media?

We'd most likely purchase Fugi and/or Maxell tapes. We've had problems in the past with off-brand LTO-1 media.

Obviously, LTO-3 media will be more expensive, and we could not write to our older gen 1 media (read-only), whereas with LTO-2 we could read and write to our older media, but LTO-3 will write much faster and have higher capacity. Not sure how long LTO-3 has been around, but the Legato compatibility guide shows our L80 as supporting either the IBM or HP LTO-2 or LTO-3 drives, so I guess LTO-3 is fully supported under Legato 7.x

Thanks.

George

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>