Networker

Re: [Networker] port vs wwn based zoning

2005-10-26 01:30:37
Subject: Re: [Networker] port vs wwn based zoning
From: "Ballinger, John M" <john.ballinger AT PNL DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:26:39 -0700
It would be clearer if you used the terms Port-WWN vs Node-WWN(i.e.
Port-WorldWideName  or  Node-WorldWideName).
Brocade recommends you use Port-WWN in zoning.

John 

-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
On Behalf Of Raghava Karu
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:09 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] port vs wwn based zoning

Hey All,

What type of zoning(SAN) is  more optimal when we enable dWWN option?
Will port based zoning work for dWWN?

Thx
Raghava

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems wit this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>