|
Re: [Networker] Throw This in the Mix: Networker vs Veritas-NetBackup vs TSM
2005-08-15 11:15:55
Sounds like either a lot of tape reading will have to take place or huge
indexes will have to be maintained. Might be simpler in terms of tape
usage, though, since you're not running fulls again, but seems with the
added overhead of managing huge indexes or reading all those tapes that
an accident is just waiting to happen? But I've never used this product,
or TSM, so what do I know.
George
Jack Bogart wrote:
The perpetual incrementals you're talking about are present in yet another product:
CommVault Galaxy. They call it a "Synthetic Full" and its constructed from
the last full plus the interim incrementals/differentials... and it does work.
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
|
|
