On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:55:09PM -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: Re: [Networker] media database problem, Athanasios
> Douitsis...:
>
> >>Have you tried using `nsrck', specifically with `-L6'?
> >>
> >>Other things you could try include removing that volume (or all of those
> >>volumes) and using `scanner -m' to rebuild the media index from the tape
> >>contents.
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I suppose I could, but IMHO this is something different from what
> >I'm trying to do. If I understand correct, doing either
> >nsrck or scanner -m would build the online index.
>
> scanner -m should repopulate the media database with information about
> the volume you scanned, including its name, volid, and what ssids are on
> that volume. It won't rebuild the client file indexes.
>
> nsrck -L6 should do the most automatic consistency checking (and fixing) of
> both your media database and client indexes. Although you don't care
> about your client file indexes, you do care about the media database.
> It's possible that -L6 could fix the problem you're seeing.
>
> >I don't
> >want to do that, I just want to fetch the entire save set. In fact,
> >since this is Offsite backup,indexes are not needed as they would get
> >in the way of normal backups/restores.(correct me if I am wrong)
> >
> >When I use something like
> >
> >recover -S 3103859202
> >
> >the indexes shouldn't be consulted at all, no?
>
> It must consult the media database to do this. The client file indexes
> would not be consulted.
>
> The problem appears to be in your media database. Both scanner -m and
> nsrck -L6 could possibly make changes to your media database. One or
> both of those might be able to fix the problem.
>
> >Thats why
> >I suspect some sort of media database problem. When I issue
> >the above command the freaking thing doesn't even bother
> >to ask me to place some volume in the tape drive.
> >In fact
> >even if I have Offsite.001 in the drive, it says that it couldn't
> >verify the volid of Offsite.003(!!!).
>
> It doesn't need to. You're asking for a ssid, and it knows that it needs
> four volumes for that ssid, but it immediately discovers that it doesn't
> know anything about one of the volids, and issues the error.
>
> >Any suggestions?
>
> Yes:
>
> nsrck -L6
>
> and if that doesn't resolve the issue, delete Offsite.003 from your
> database and run
>
> scanner -m
>
> on it. ;-)
Well, I'll try these and see if it resolves the problem. Thanks for the
advice!...
Cheers,
Athanasios
>
> Tim
> --
> Tim Mooney mooney AT dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak DOT
> edu
> Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
> Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
> North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
> to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
> should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|