Re: [Networker] Schedules

2005-04-12 18:43:02
Subject: Re: [Networker] Schedules
From: Dave Mussulman <mussulma AT CS.UIUC DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:36:59 -0500
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:10:27PM -0400, Neild, Jim wrote:
> Just wanted to see how people have their schedules configured for
> various types of backups (system states and drive, exchange, sql, etc.).
> In particular, I was wondering how people use Backup levels (i.e.
> F,I,I,I,I,I,I or F,1,1,1,1,1,1 or F,1,2,3,4,5,6 etc) in their schedules.
> I currently run a lot of my groups with F,I,I,F,I,I,I and was thinking
> about removing the second full during the week but I am a little
> paranoid about having a bad level FULL tape.
> Any input would be helpful.

We found that most of our full backups were cold, unused data so we
don't run them as often.  It might open us up to some data loss on a bad
full tape, but we can probably get most of that data back through
incremental recovers or older fulls.  (But we also just jumped up from
DLT7 to LTO3, and with that much data on a tape we might rethink these

We do a full every quarter, a 3 every month, a 5 every weekend, and an
incremental daily.


Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>