In my experience, Legato support is about the same as it has been for the
past couple of years: outstanding for quick, simple problems and
increasingly questionable as the issues become more complex and convoluted.
Part of the problem may be the EMC takeover/integration. Another part is
that as time goes on we customers learn the "tricks" and have less need for
quick, simple questions. Thus, we get more and more questionable support.
But as one who remembers The Dark Days of Legato support, today's support is
a great leap forward.
Conrad Macina
Pfizer, Inc.
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:02:52 -0800, michael brooks <MichaelB AT SEQUOIAINS DOT
COM>
wrote:
>when something is already at rock-bottom, how can it drop?...
>
>that said, probably the emc acquisition and subsequent
>re-alignment/organization is shaking things up a bit
>
>michael brooks ........... michaelb AT sequoiains DOT com
>Network Administrator .... 831.657.4539 (phone)
>Sequoia Insurance ........ 831.657.4512 (fax)
>::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>"Flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss"
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
>On Behalf Of Oscar Olsson
>Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 7:23 AM
>To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
>Subject: [Networker] Legato support worse than usual?
>
>During the last couple of months, I feel like the quality of Legato tech
>support has dropped sharply. No longer do I get fairly quick and
>accurate answers for my problems. Instead, I receive slow responses that
>perhaps are more aimed at stalling the solution process, rather than
>providing the answers I'm looking for. And in the end, it can be weeks
>before I even receive a response, even if it has little meaningful
>content.
>
>I feel that this is a trend that has happened during last fall. Has
>anyone else noticed this, and/or have info on if they have reorganized
>their helpdesk or something?
>
>//Oscar
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
>email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also
>view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list should
>be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
>should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
