Networker

Re: [Networker] Strange backup behaviour

2004-10-11 05:24:21
Subject: Re: [Networker] Strange backup behaviour
From: Björn Lundström <bjorn.lundstrom AT PROACT DOT SE>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:24:07 +0200
Mark,

What do you mean by nsrmmd timeout setting , where is that set ?


Best Regards,
Björn Lundström

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Dyer [mailto:mdyer AT OAOT DOT COM] 
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 5:52 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Strange backup behaviour

Rama,

We just resolved this very problem on one of my systems.  We increased the
NSRmmd Timeout setting.  Once that was done, our backups completed without
further errors.

HTH,
Mark Dyer

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:30:03 +0100, Krishnan, Ramamurthy
<Ramamurthy.Krishnan AT KPMG.CO DOT UK> wrote:

>Hi
>
>I see NetWorker behaving strangely for the full backup of a particular
>server alone.  What actually happens is when it backups its D drive, it
>keeps on splitting the saveset for every 2000MB.  But for many other
>servers (even for other partitions on the same server) it backs up more
>2000MB in one go (it atleast does'nt give any "splitting" messages).
>Even more painful is that the backup fails with the message
>"SERVER_NAME: D:\ 2 retries attempted".. but I see the data still
>writing.
>
>Obviously I don't see it in the index and hence the backups are failing
>for sure.  This happens only for full backups.  Incrementals and
>differentials go through good.  Has anybody experienced this before?
>
>NetWorker 6.1.3 server running on Solaris 2.8.  Client running Windows
>NT SP6A.  The D drive is a NTFS partition.
>
>Thanks in advance for any help.
>
>Rgds, Ram.
>
>
>
>
>                Email Disclaimer
>
>This email has been sent from KPMG LLP, a UK limited
>liability partnership, or from one of the companies within
>its control (which include KPMG Audit Plc , KPMG United
>Kingdom Plc and KPMG UK Limited). The information in
>this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
>It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
>email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the
>intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
>or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful.  When addressed to
>our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email
>are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
>governing KPMG client engagement letter.
>
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
>should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>