Many times, the only way I know to deal with it is to pre-label the tapes.
Anyone have any other thoughts?
Michael D. Curran
Senior Systems Engineer
Thomson Legal And Regulatory
-----Original Message-----
From: Ty Young [mailto:phillip_young AT I2 DOT COM]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:30 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] 7.1: target sessions ignored when relabelling
recyclable tapes
NetWorker 7.1, Solaris 8 (this is a server, or more properly, storage
node issue)
Scenario: backups underway, and server is waiting for some quantity of
recyclable tapes (let's say 8.) Upon loading recyclable tapes, nsrd
makes some nsrjb requests to re-label 8 tapes. As soon as the first one
is labelled, however, it appears that not only is it loaded into a drive
for writing, but that a majority, if not all, of the suspended sessions
get routed to this one tape (i.e., target sessions for whatever drive
appears to be ignored.) The result is that we may see as many as 25-30
streams going to one tape, while the remaining 7 newly-relabelled tapes
sit idle in their drives.
Anybody else seen this behavior?
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|