Networker

Re: [Networker] aborted due to inactivity

2004-01-06 13:00:58
Subject: Re: [Networker] aborted due to inactivity
From: "King, David - Eastman" <dking AT EASTMAN DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:59:38 -0500
My VMS disk backup always times out at the 4 GB mark, since that is
where the directory was read.

David L. King







-----Original Message-----
From: robert.maiello AT THOMSON DOT COM [mailto:robert.maiello AT THOMSON DOT 
COM] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:55 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] aborted due to inactivity


When you say it always fails at the 42GB mark; does it always fail after
the same amount of time?  If you have serveral retries set, do you see
it back up 42Gb, then timeout, then back up 42GB again?

If so, this would indicate an external severing of the control
connection..

First question from Legato will be "is there a firewall involved?"

Robert Maiello
Thomson Healthcare

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:17:35 -0500, Joel Fisher <jfisher AT WFUBMC DOT EDU>
wrote:

>Hey All,
>
>
>
>I'm wondering if anyone might be able to shed some light on a problem 
>I've be troubleshooting.
>
>
>
>Server: Sun E450/Solaris2.6/SBU 6.1.3
>
>Client: Compaq/Win 2K3 cluster/Legato 7.0 client
>
>
>
>I get the below failure on full backups(incremental backups complete 
>successfully).
>
>
>
>* client1.nt.wfubmc.edu:P: 1 retry attempted
>
>* client1.nt.wfubmc.edu:P: 01/02/04 08:53:23 nsrexec: Attempting a kill

>on remote save
>
>* client1.nt.wfubmc.edu:P: 01/02/04 08:58:23 nsrexec: Attempting a kill

>on remote save
>
>* client1.nt.wfubmc.edu:P: write: Broken pipe
>
>* client1.nt.wfubmc.edu:P: aborted due to inactivity
>
>
>
>I've increase the savegroup timeout to 360 and it made no difference.
>
>
>
>I can run the backup directly from client1 successfully, but when I 
>start it from the backup server it fails.  When it fails it always 
>seems to fail at 42GB.  So I thought maybe there as a bad file or 
>something like that causing it to hang, but when it ran successfully 
>directly from the client that killed that theory.  I'm kind of stumped 
>right now.
>
>
>
>Anyone ever have a similar problem?
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>Joel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via 
>email to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at 
>http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also 
>view and post messages to the list. 
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also
view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=