Networker

Re: [Networker] Faster Cloning. By saveset or volume?

2003-09-26 14:38:21
Subject: Re: [Networker] Faster Cloning. By saveset or volume?
From: T M <loxley99 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:38:13 -0400
Guy,

I don't think that cloning 'by volume' is an available option.
Are you only looking for a faster way to make duplicate tapes?  or is your
prime objective here something different than that?

Good luck,
Tom

-----------
From: "Novello, Guy" <GNovello AT PHCS DOT COM>
Reply-To: Legato NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU>,
        "Novello, Guy" <GNovello AT PHCS DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Faster Cloning. By saveset or volume?
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:06:04 -0400


Hello Everyone,

I seem to remember a discussion over which was the faster way to clone. I
am currently
using the ssid, but I am thinking it may be faster cloning the volumes.

Has anyone tested this?

Thanks in Advance!

Guy

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=