Re: [Networker] Faster Cloning. By saveset or volume?
2003-09-26 14:38:21
Guy,
I don't think that cloning 'by volume' is an available option.
Are you only looking for a faster way to make duplicate tapes? or is your
prime objective here something different than that?
Good luck,
Tom
-----------
From: "Novello, Guy" <GNovello AT PHCS DOT COM>
Reply-To: Legato NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU>,
"Novello, Guy" <GNovello AT PHCS DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Faster Cloning. By saveset or volume?
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:06:04 -0400
Hello Everyone,
I seem to remember a discussion over which was the faster way to clone. I
am currently
using the ssid, but I am thinking it may be faster cloning the volumes.
Has anyone tested this?
Thanks in Advance!
Guy
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
|
|