Re: [Networker] Too(?) much data in incremental savesets
2003-07-07 12:31:13
Oh, I didn't understand the implications of an NDMP backup.
If they were W2K clients and regular backups I would reccommend the NTFS
change journal which we used to get around the archive bit behavior.
Since this is a NDMP client, I have no knowledge how Networker handles the
backup levels and how files are flagged for backup. A call to Legato
to explain it would probably in order. I suppose it would be based somehow
on whatever filesystem is in the NetApp Filer??
Robert Maiello
Thomson Healthcare
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:53:48 +0200, Oscar Olsson <spam1 AT QBRANCH DOT SE> wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 Phillip_Young AT i2 DOT com wrote:
>
>> You can set the system environment variable "NSR_AVOID_ARCHIVE" to a
>> non-null value on win2k and winNT client systems. This requires a reboot
>> of the client system but will cause NetWorker to ignore the archive bit's
>> value when determining whether a file has changed in some way other than
>> modtime and checksum. This configuration change has saved us *hundreds* of
>> GB of needless backup every night while providing the necessary coverage.
>
>I guess this is good for NT/W2K clients, but is there anything similar for
>NetApp filers and the NDMP backups?
>
>//Oscar - will probably try this on a client or two
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list.
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
Re: [Networker] Too(?) much data in incremental savesets,
Robert Maiello <=
|
|
|