Networker

Re: [Networker] 7.0 Experience

2003-07-02 04:13:18
Subject: Re: [Networker] 7.0 Experience
From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" <tarjei.jensen AT KVAERNER DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 02:43:12 -0400
Reed, Ted G wrote:
>That was under 6.1.1.  Since we have moved to 6.1.3, at least nsrd is
>lower during the day then it used to be....and we're seeing fewer media
>criticals.  But it still is the case that if we start to fall behind on
>media requests, everything starts to bog and it gets worse and worse as
>time progresses.  Last Saturday, one of our staff spent 10 hours playing
>mount catch-up because the nodes had fallen behind so badly.  And each
>time our guy got close to clearing the mount requests, 2 or 3 tapes would
>hit Full status and legato would demand additional tapes.

Have you considered using a more powerful host as the backup server? What
about a different make of computer? HP, IBM, SGI, whatever?

greetings,

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>