Networker

Re: [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3

2003-06-13 09:29:33
Subject: Re: [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3
From: Robert Maiello <robert.maiello AT MEDEC DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:29:35 -0400
We've been pretty stable on 6.1.2 with some hotfixes.   That said, despite
what you've read, you may be better off from a support point of view on
6.1.3.   We were on 6.0.3 for quite a while also..as you probably know most
support calls then get treated with a reccomendation to upgrade.

Good luck.

Robert Maiello
Thomson Healthcare


On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:16:34 -0400, Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU> 
wrote:

>Hi,
>
>We're are planning an upgrade.  We currently run v6.0.3 on Tru64 v4.0f
>and we're planning on implementing v6.1.x on Solaris.  Based on recent
>posts, it seems like there are a number of issues with v6.1.3.  Is
>v6.1.2 more stable?
>
>Thanks.
>Teresa
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list.
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>