The file was recovered at around 3 GB into the saveset. We do not clone
tapes, so I can't try that, but I might re-try the recovery sometime
when the network is less busy. Perhaps that played a major factor. Some
users were complaining that the network was slow today. Also, I guess I
could try recovering the entire saveset, canceling after a few minutes,
just to see how fast it reads data when it's not hunting for a
particular file.

George

"Day, David" wrote:
>
> I've been wondering and have not tried yet; have you tried recovering from a
> clone versus from the original backup?  Since the clone demultiplexed the
> backup, seems it would be faster.
> David

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=