Networker

Re: [Networker] SAN storage node

2003-02-20 17:09:07
Subject: Re: [Networker] SAN storage node
From: f_x <f_x AT GMX DOT NET>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:13:12 +0100
Teresa Biehler wrote:
o Is anyone using SAN storage nodes?
- 6 SAN Nodes
- 1 Library Compaq ESL9198
- 6 DLT8000 Drives
- shared between the Backup Server and 6 SAP Server as SAN Node
- Backup Server 2x700Mhz 640MB RAM
- ~1.4TB Data to Backup (1TB Full Backup every day)
o How difficult was the installation?  What problems did you have during
set up?
- a SAN Node is a normal StorageNode, but much cheaper because of he can
  only backup himself
- Bus Resets because of buggy SCSI2Fibre Router(Compaq MDR) firmware
- the NT SAN Nodes have made no problems
- the W2k SAN Nodes must have turned off the Removable Storage Manager
- On W2k Plug&P(l|r)ay is sometimes annoying, e.g. with new Drive
  Firmware You have new Drives on W2k
o What type library do you have?
- 1 Library Compaq ESL9198
o What has your experience been with this configuration?
- it works, but you can achive the same result, if you use a faster
  backup server and have a seperate backup giga network
o What problems have you seen?
- see 2nd point
o Has the performance been what you expected?
- the SAP productive System (4x700Mhz Xeon 4GB RAM) feeds 5 drives with
  upto 50MB/s over one 1Gbit Fibre Card (50MB/s from the RAID System and
  50MB/s to the Tapedrives)
- if You use 2Gbit or to different Fibre Cards for the RAID and the
  Tapes You can achive even more
- the Load on the System is around 5-20% for the Backup Processes
- we use only the hardware compression of the drives


i hope it helps.
f_x

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>