Networker

Re: [Networker] 28 Storage Nodes

2002-12-18 15:44:04
Subject: Re: [Networker] 28 Storage Nodes
From: Terry Lemons <lemons_terry AT EMC DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:27:38 -0500
Thanks, Wes.  I had the section loaded in my Paste buffer anyway, so here it
is:
 
I think the real answer to your question is found in
http://web1.legato.com/infodev/publications/NetWorker/WINDOWS/6.1.3/winrs.pd
f on p. 22. Here's the section, in full:

"Large Number of Devices Are Supported in an Enterprise Environment

"In a NetWorker environment, every tape drive is controlled by an nsrmmd
daemon.

When the server and storage nodes share all drives, the number of nsrmmd
daemons

is the number of storage nodes (including the server) times the number of
shared

drives. For example, a datazone with six shared drives and seven hosts would
have 42

nsrmmd daemons.

"For releases prior to 6.1.3, Legato recommends 45 nsrmmd daemons forWindows
and

64 for UNIX. This is a recommended number of nsrmmd daemons in a datazone,
but

this can vary with the hardware, software or workload. Therefore, these
numbers are

not limits, but rather recommendations. There are enterprise environments
that have

stable NetWorker datazones with more than 60 nsrmmd daemons with Windows

NetWorker servers and more than 100 nsrmmd daemons with UNIX NetWorker

servers.

"Legato has successfully tested 133 nsrmmd daemons and 26 physical tape
devices (20

LTO and 6 DLT8000) shared among 7 heterogeneous Storage Nodes and NetWorker

6.1.3 UNIX and Windows 2000 Servers.

"Important: The number 133 is not a limit, but rather a recommendation."

-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Ono [mailto:wono AT legato DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:21 PM
To: 'Legato NetWorker discussion'; 'lemons_terry AT EMC DOT COM'
Subject: RE: [Networker] 28 Storage Nodes



6.1.3 is supposed to scale better.  See page 22 in the 6.1.3 Release
Supplement (
http://web1.legato.com/infodev/publications/NetWorker/WINDOWS/6.1.3/winrs.pd
f
<http://web1.legato.com/infodev/publications/NetWorker/WINDOWS/6.1.3/winrs.p
df> ) for more info.

Wes 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Terry Lemons [ mailto:lemons_terry AT EMC DOT COM
<mailto:lemons_terry AT EMC DOT COM> ] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:14 PM 
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU 
Subject: Re: [Networker] 28 Storage Nodes 


Hi John 

You've hit a scaling problem with NetWorker, one that is particularly 
painful on its Windows platform.  In your environment, your NetWorker server

master process [nsrd] must control (14*6) [DDS]+ 14*1 [local tape drive(s)] 
= 98 nsrmmd processes.  Check the documentation, but I'm pretty sure that 
NetWorker V6.1.1 does not support that many.  Also check V6.1.3 (and, maybe,

V6.2) to see if that limit has been increased in those versions. 

Good luck! 
tl 

Terry Lemons 
CLARiiON Applications Integration Engineering 
        EMC²            
where information lives 

4400 Computer Drive, MS D239 
Westboro MA 01580 
Phone: 508 898 7312 
Email: Lemons_Terry AT emc DOT com 


-----Original Message----- 
From: Ballinger, John M [ mailto:john.ballinger AT PNL DOT GOV
<mailto:john.ballinger AT PNL DOT GOV> ] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:56 PM 
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU 
Subject: [Networker] 28 Storage Nodes 


We have a NetWorker 6.1.1 Backup Server on Win2k that runs fine with a 
limited number of backups but fails with all kinds of network-error 
appearing problems if you go above. 

We have 28 storage nodes - 14 of these are on the SAN sharing via DDS 6 tape

drives on an ADIC Scalar 1000 
and the other 14 have locally attached tape-drives. 

So we think the problem is with some resource on the win2k NetWorker backup 
server. 
Specifically the number of tcp connections. 

Has anyone seen this or have any ideas of how to confirm it / and /or fix 
the problem? 

thanks - John 

-- 
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email 
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at 
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html
<http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html>  where you can 
also view and post messages to the list. 
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= 

-- 
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email 
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at 
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html
<http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html>  where you can 
also view and post messages to the list. 
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= 


--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>