Have you looked at NetWorker Recovery Manager 2.0, which supports Windows
2000? (the previous version, 1.x, supports NT only.) We've had very
good success in our tryouts of this new product.
-ty
Phillip T. ("Ty") Young, DMA
Backup/Recovery Systems Mgr.
Network Services Group
i2 Technologies, Inc.
"Simpkins, Jim (euler:eti)" <Jim.Simpkins AT EULERGROUP DOT COM>
Sent by: Legato NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
10/16/2002 07:54 AM
Please respond to Legato NetWorker discussion; Please respond to
"Simpkins, Jim (euler:eti)"
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: [Networker] Version 6.x Disaster Recovery
Our backup servers are Compaq Proliant NT4 Sp6a, Networker 6.1.1, all
clients are also on 6.1.1
Recently, we went through a DR exercise but had problems recovering our
PDC.
It turned out that the problem was that the machine supplied by our DR
equipment providers was not exactly the same spec as the original machine.
We were able to complete our exercise because, fortunately, we were able
to
recover one of our BDCs.
We requested the company, through whom we obtain the Legato software, to
raise a call to query what restrictions there are when performing bare
metal
recoveries. The list may be interested in the reply we received...
>>
What your customer has seen is correct. In NW 5.5 you could
relocate
or
direct the registry to another machine. In NW 6.0 onwards this
stopped on
the advice of Microsoft. MS were concerned about people moving the
data from
one machine to another and making the system unstable and
difficult
for them
to support. In general we assume that people follow MS advice when
recovering data to another machine. This is to create a new
machine, load
OS and Service Packs, load the application and then recover the
data
only.
DR should only be carried out on the same machine. Recovering the
OS
to a
machine that is not the same will cause unpredictable results.
There are some notes that are in the NetWorker for Windows release
supplements which I have taken and updated. These words have been
blessed by
our Product Managers so you can take them as official or use the
printed
version in the manuals. It is interesting that you have raised
this
point as
I was expecting a note to be put in the next PSAM Bulletin to
cover
this.
Many other customers ask the same question. I hope this is helpful
and
covers the points you raised.
Please be aware of the following limitations on all versions of
NetWorker
from 5.7 onwards
Directed Recovery/ relocation of SYSTEM Save Sets Not Supported
(LGTpa20718)
Directed recovery of SYSTEM save sets is not supported, either on
Windows NT
4.0 or Windows 2000. Also if a user tries to relocate the SYSTEM
save set to a
different location on the same computer this will overwrite
existing
SYSTEM
STATE or REGISTRY without warning the user.
Limitations in NetWorker Features on Windows 2000
The following limitations pertain to NetWorker software running on
Windows
2000.
Note: For Windows 2000, the term SYSTEM save sets refers
collectively to the
SYSTEM
STATE, SYSTEM DB, and SYSTEM FILES save sets. These save sets were
first
introduced in NetWorker release 5.7 to support operations related
to
the
Windows 2000 system state, also called the state of the machine.
>>
For those of you that rely on third parties to provide equipment in the
event of a disaster, this could be a significant problem. We are still
looking into the implications for our own DR plans. Has anyone else hit
this
problem before, if so, did you achieve a reasonable solution. Given the
potential impact of this change, I'm rather surprised that the opinions of
customers were not canvassed (at least as far as I know), as well as those
of Microsoft.
The prospect of having to re-install every application again, on every
server, when in a DR situation will certainly add a significant amount to
the overall recovery time, especially when large numbers of servers are
involved. One of the solutions we will have to consider is replacing
Networker as our backup solution...
Jim Simpkin
Database Administrator
Euler Trade Indemnity plc
1 Canada Square
London, E14 5DX
United Kingdom
Tel : +44 (0)20 7860-2918
Fax : +44 (0)20 7860-2749
E-mail : Jim.Simpkins AT eulergroup DOT com
Please Note: This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by law.
This e-mail is intended solely for the named recipient(s). If you receive
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone
(reverse charges accepted) on 020 7512 9333. Please do not disclose the
contents to any other person, use information contained in it for any
purpose, store or copy it. Although this e-mail and any attachments are
believed to be free of any virus, which might affect a computer system
into
which it is received and opened, EULER Trade Indemnity plc can not
guarantee
this and does not accept responsibility for any damage resulting from the
use of this e-mail. Copyright in this e-mail and any attachments remains
with us. EULER Trade Indemnity plc. Registered in England No.149786.
Registered Office: 1 Canada Square, London E14 5DX
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
