Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape errors: how many is considered normal?

2017-06-04 06:11:28
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Tape errors: how many is considered normal?
From: Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com>
To: Ivan Adzhubey <iadzhubey AT rics.bwh.harvard DOT edu>, bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 12:10:16 +0200
Hello,

I personally do not know the answer to your question, but as long they are corrected errors and not more than 0.1% of the reads/writes and there are no uncorrected errors and no tape alerts, I would imagine it is OK.

Here is what I get on my LTO-5 drive. It is a reconditioned drive that I installed about 2 months ago, so it does not have a terribly long history:

root@groschat:/home/kern# smartctl -H -l error /dev/sg0
smartctl 6.5 2016-01-24 r4214 [x86_64-linux-4.4.0-78-generic] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-16, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
TapeAlert: OK
Error counter log:
Errors Corrected by Total Correction Gigabytes Total ECC rereads/ errors algorithm processed uncorrected fast | delayed rewrites corrected invocations [10^9 bytes] errors read: 2 0 0 0 2 0.000 0 write: 1337 0 0 0 3416 0.000 0

I would be curious to hear what statistics Alan Brown has since he make very heavy use of his drives.

Best regards,

Kern



On 06/04/2017 12:37 AM, Ivan Adzhubey wrote:
Hi,

Below is the SMART TapeAlert output I received after running btape 'test' and
'speed' tests on a new IBM ULTRIUM-HH5 LTO-5 drive using brand new Fujifilm
tape. Is it normal to see 40 (corrected) errors per few GBs of data that the
tests have written to tape?

$ smartctl -H -l error /dev/sgtape1
smartctl 6.5 2016-01-24 r4214 [x86_64-linux-4.4.0-78-generic] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-16, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
TapeAlert: OK
Error counter log:
            Errors Corrected by           Total   Correction     Gigabytes
Total
                ECC          rereads/    errors   algorithm      processed
uncorrected
            fast | delayed   rewrites  corrected  invocations   [10^9 bytes]
errors
read:          0        0         0         0          0          0.010
0
write:         0        0         0        40         40          0.073
0

Non-medium error count:        0

Thanks,
Ivan



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by https://kimlaw.us