[Bacula-users] bacula ignoring mtimeonly
2017-03-28 22:46:09
I am using bacula 5.x and I recently replaced the hardware for a client
(new machine). I used "rsync -a" to copy over the contents of one of
the filesystems. Now bacula wants to back up everything again even
though nothing is changed. The filesystem is the same and the path to
the files is the same. I thought this might have to do with ctime
changing, so I tried using "mtimeonly=yes" option for the FileSet
(Ignore fileset changes=yes is already set), yet when I manually run an
Incremental backup, it doesn't get upgraded to a Full yet it is still
grabbing all the files that haven't changed. Here is an example file
that bacula is grabbing which it shouldn't:
[scar@oldserver ~]$ ls -l <file>
-rw-rw-r-- 1 10022 101 422186903 Aug 26 2016 <file>
[scar@oldserver ~]$ ls -lc <file>
-rw-rw-r-- 1 10022 101 422186903 Aug 26 2016 <file>
[scar@newserver ~]$ ls -l <file>
-rw-rw-r-- 1 10022 101 422186903 Aug 26 2016 <file>
[scar@newserver ~]$ ls -lc <file>
-rw-rw-r-- 1 10022 101 422186903 Dec 7 14:20 <file>
So we can see the ctime changed, yet with mtimeonly=yes, bacula is still
grabbing the file. Is there some other option I am over looking?
Thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] bacula ignoring mtimeonly,
scar <=
|
|
|