I'm by no means an authority on the subject, but what you're doing is, in my understanding about as good as any solution.
It's possible you could solve instead with some sort of replicated filesystem. Netapp do something like this (although that would be an expensive solution), as indeed do other storage vendors of various types. You can do something similar with glusterfs or a bunch of other options of a similar ilk. Honestly, rsync is probably better because it's far clearer what's going on without too much complexity. I guess you could refine a tiny bit by doing some sort of 'RunAfter' script to copy the files as soon as the backup completes, but again, it's not doing much you can't do with a cron job. We've elected for the cron solution (we wait for the file(s) to reach a certain age before we do anything), whereupon we encrypt and send to the cloud. The underlying transport may be different, but the end result is much the same. ...Ralph
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev _______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|