Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Inconsistent use of checksums in ancient 3.0.3 version

2016-05-09 21:04:42
Subject: [Bacula-users] Inconsistent use of checksums in ancient 3.0.3 version
From: Davin Church <davinchurch AT gmail DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 20:02:37 -0500
For years I've been using the ancient 3.0.3 version of Bacula, but 
I'm now having computer problems and I want to verify my current 
files' MD5 checksums against the database.  However, when I look in 
the database's File.MD5 column, I find that some entries have 
reasonable-looking base64-encoded checksums but many just have 
"0".  I see no particular pattern to when checksums do or don't appear.

Why would some File entries have checksums and some not?  Does anyone 
know of a bug in that old system that caused some checksums to be missing?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>