Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Are my Bacula backups fast enough?

2016-04-22 11:11:44
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Are my Bacula backups fast enough?
From: Jason Voorhees <jvoorhees1 AT gmail DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:10:51 -0500
I forgot to say that Bacula client on my Zimbra server (which is
currently being backed up) is using most of the CPU. According to top
command, bacula-fd is reporting between 10%, 30% or even 80% of CPU
usage. Meanwhile, swap usage is currently low (~ 3%)

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Jason Voorhees <jvoorhees1 AT gmail DOT com> 
wrote:
> Hello guys:
>
> I'd like you to share some thoughs about my scenario and performance.
> Here's what I have:
>
> Server (Director & Storage)
> ====================
> System: KVM guest running on Proxmox 4.1 host
> Network: virtio
> Storage: 5x200 GB Virtual disks (qcow2 format), used as physical volumes
> Filesystem: ext4 'by default' on LVM
> Memory: 4 GB
> CPU: 1 core on guest, 8 cores on host (Intel Core i7 3.4 GHz)
> Bacula: 7.4.0 built from source
> OS: CentOS 7 x86_64
> Roles: Bacula with MySQL (used only for backups, nothing else)
>
>
>
> - iperf tests between my bacula server and one of my clients (which is
> also a KVM guest sharing the same physical host with virtio network)
> gave me near 9.78 Gbps rate which seems awesome.
> - I'm using disk backups without Attribute Spooling enabled, yet.
> - GZIP compression and SHA1 signatures are also enabled for all my jobs.
> - MySQL hasn't been tuned at all, it came by default.
>
>
> Yesterday, I ran a Full backup for a Samba fileserver with 280 GB of
> data. Such backup took about 6 hours, having near 15% compression rate
> and near 240 GB written by SD and FD daemons. This Samba server have
> Bacula Client 2.4.4.
>
> Today I'm running a Full backup for a Zimbra server with near 450 GB
> of data to be backed up. I'm running iptraf-ng right now and I can see
> variable rate transfer through my network interface from 10 Mbps up to
> 80 Mbps with an average of 50 Mbps.
>
> I'd like to hear some thoughts from you because I have some questions:
>
> - Is it normal to have a rate of 50 Mbps rate while running a backup?
> - How can I know if MySQL is a bottleneck?
> - Should I disable compression and signatures to improve speed of
> backups? Is it worth it?
> - What if I enable attribute spooling? I've read posts in which some
> people noticed an improvement on data transfer but the despooling
> process of attributes it took too long.
> - Is my backup speed good enough? Should I worry about it? Can they be
> even faster?
>
> Thanks in advance for reading and helping :)
>
> Have a nice day

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>