Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Using TLS only for one specific client -- it is possible?

2013-03-14 11:55:16
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using TLS only for one specific client -- it is possible?
From: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
To: Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm AT users.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:52:27 +0900
On Mar 14, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm AT 
users.sourceforge DOT net> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:48:23 +0900
> Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org> wrote:
> 
>>>> I also know about stunnel, but I'm hesitant to use it due to these
>>>> reasons:
>>>> 1) At least two stunnel instances will be required to be set up and
>>>>  maintained.
>>>> 2) Using stunnel involves unnecessary copying of (lots of) data.
>>> 
>>> You could overcome 1 by using a single ssh command with the -L and
>>> -R options to make the tunnels.
>> 
>> My preference of late is to not use TLS, but to use a VPN.  I use
>> OpenVPN on all my remote clients.
> 
> I'm a big fan of OpenVPN myself, and I use it to connect several branch
> offices with the central one, but I'm inclined to think that to back up
> a bunch of web sites (static content + dumps of several MySQL
> databases) hosted on a VPS a full-blown VPN solution appears to beslightly 
> over the top.

Sure. YMMV. But for my situation, it's great. As for 'full blown', adding a new 
client to the mix is easy 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users