Re: [Bacula-users] Two servers one ... robot?

Subject:

From:

To:

"shouldbe q931" <shouldbeq931 AT gmail DOT com>

Date:

Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:24:15 -0700

The problem is that we're looking at extremely large enterprise libraries and dozens of sd's.

Our library simply -may- not be able to handle as many partitions as we would end up needing.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Two servers one ... robot?
From: shouldbe q931 <shouldbeq931 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, February 27, 2013 4:12 pm
To: etannehill AT godaddy DOT com
Cc: Bacula Users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:58 PM, <etannehill AT godaddy DOT com> wrote:
> I am looking to see if it is possible to run two storage directors both
> talking to the same robotic library?
>
> Does anyone have first hand experience with this?
>

The robot would have to support partitioning, at which point it is
"logically" two robots.

I've seen an Overland Neo 4000 with 4 drives partitioned in two, it
worked quite well.

Cheers

Arne

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Two servers one ... robot?, Jérôme Blion

Next by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Two servers one ... robot?, shouldbe q931

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Two servers one ... robot?, Phil Stracchino

Next by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Two servers one ... robot?, shouldbe q931

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]