Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-22 13:29:54
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:26:43 +0100
>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:54:17 +0200, "JÜrgen Ecker" said:
> 
> following situation: if i run a full backup, everything run fine, but if i 
> run after a fullbackup an differential backup, bacula backups data witch 
> timestamp haven't changed. Thats a big problem, because bacula backups 
> arbitrary data, so that i have sometimes 50GB differental backups 10 minutes 
> after a full backup. Thats not possible that in 10 minutes 50GB Data have a
> changed timestamp. If i search the differential backuped files, i see 
> data that have a timestamp from 2004-11-16 and will backuped after all. 
> Whats went wrong? Is that a bacula bug. I have installed the 5.2.10 FD 
> version and the 5.2.5 server version. Can anyone help?

It could be the ctime field that is newer.  Look at the output of the "stat"
program for the file.

Also, are you using Accurate=yes in the job definition?

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>