Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] encryption & compression

2012-08-22 13:10:56
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] encryption & compression
From: Phil Stracchino <alaric AT metrocast DOT net>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:08:04 -0400
On 08/22/12 11:18, lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de wrote:
> Zitat von lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de:
>> according to the manual client based software compression is not
>> useful when using tape drives with builtin compression like LTO. Is
>> this still true when using data encryption? With this the encrypted
>> data are normally not really compresable anymore but a compression on
>> the client before encryption could be useful, no?
>>
>> Any opinion on this?
> 
> Anyone aware if i'm right that compression is happening *before* encryption?

It's certainly *supposed* to.  Encryption works better when redundancy
is eliminated from the cleartext before encryption, plus there's a
smaller volume of data to encrypt.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
  Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>