[Bacula-users] Does bacula keep backing up against read errors?
2012-07-16 09:26:57
I've tried to back up an NTFS partition on a RAID array on windows server 2008.
I used "windows server backup" which is the native backup solution and
areca backup.
Both stopped backing up when they encountered temporary read errors
which might have been reported by the hardware RAID controller.
When I opened the file which reported the read errors, they were fine.
I asked in freenode #amanda, and someone told me that amanda would
ignore read errors and keep backing up if amanda used GNUTAR.
But setting up amanda on windows server 2008 seemed like a difficult task.
Can I configure bacula to ignore read errors and keep backing up?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Bacula-users] Does bacula keep backing up against read errors?,
crocket <=
|
|
|