Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Error 3915 Bad Job command

2012-05-09 06:06:44
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Error 3915 Bad Job command
From: Tilman Schmidt <t.schmidt AT phoenixsoftware DOT de>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:04:46 +0200
Am 05.05.2012 19:41, schrieb Volker Böhm:
> Am 04.05.2012 01:43, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:

>> First of all, it's quite unusual to have 5 or 10 SDs. Most installations
>> have one or two, and in the majority of cases one of them will be on the
>> same machine as the director. So you only have to make sure that those
>> two or three machines run the same version.
> Yes, you're right: I usually don't have that many _SDs_ in an
> installation. But from what should I know that only the interface
> between the director and the _SDs_ is version dependent.

That's the official rule of what Bacula supports:
- SD should be the same version as director
- FD should be the same or smaller version as director (and SD)

> If also the FDs
> should have similar/equal versions, then it would be (nearly) impossible
> in a real network.

Exactly. That would make Bacula more or less unusable. But it is not so.

> And if I make a _full_ backup of one of my notebooks, I prefer to
> connect the target disk directly to this notebook to have 50 - 80 MB/s
> storage rate and not only 25 MB/s (1000 Mbit network) resp. 12 MB/s (100
> Mbit). And so every notebook has an SD installed.

That is not the scenario Bacula is designed for, so you'll have to make
allowances.

> 1. Install the new packets (5.2.5) from Ubuntu 12.04 on the server
> (Ubuntu 10.4 LTS)? [...]
> 2. Install the old packets from ubuntu 10.04 on the Workstation to have
> an old (an compatible) SD? [...]

Neither of the two. It is never a good idea to mix packages from
different major releases of a distribution.

I don't use Ubuntu myself, but if it's anything like openSUSE or CentOS
then you'll be better off using packages from the Bacula community.
There you can expect to find builds of the most recent Bacula version
for all supported releases of an OS distribution.

> 3. Compile bacula from the sources?

As I wrote last time already, that's the last resort if everything
else fails, ie. if you cannot find readymade packages that fit
your needs.

> And which Version to compile?

The most recent one, of course. That way you can keep all existing FDs
because you are sure none of them is newer than your director.

> 3b. Version 5.0.1 on the Workstation(s) to have a minimal effort?

The effort is the same whether you compile an older version or
the current one.

HTH

-- 
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>